Cross-System Evaluation of Clinical Trial Search Engines

نویسندگان

  • Silis Y. Jiang
  • Chunhua Weng
چکیده

Clinical trials are fundamental to the advancement of medicine but constantly face recruitment difficulties. Various clinical trial search engines have been designed to help health consumers identify trials for which they may be eligible. Unfortunately, knowledge of the usefulness and usability of their designs remains scarce. In this study, we used mixed methods, including time-motion analysis, think-aloud protocol, and survey, to evaluate five popular clinical trial search engines with 11 users. Differences in user preferences and time spent on each system were observed and correlated with user characteristics. In general, searching for applicable trials using these systems is a cognitively demanding task. Our results show that user perceptions of these systems are multifactorial. The survey indicated eTACTS being the generally preferred system, but this finding did not persist among all mixed methods. This study confirms the value of mixed-methods for a comprehensive system evaluation. Future system designers must be aware that different users groups expect different functionalities.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Review of ranked-based and unranked-based metrics for determining the effectiveness of search engines

Purpose: Traditionally, there have many metrics for evaluating the search engine, nevertheless various researchers’ proposed new metrics in recent years. Aware of this new metrics is essential to conduct research on evaluation of the search engine field. So, the purpose of this study was to provide an analysis of important and new metrics for evaluating the search engines. Methodology: This is ...

متن کامل

ارزیابی خودکار جویش‌گرهای ویدئویی حوزه وب فارسی بر اساس تجمیع آرا

Today, the growth of the internet and its high influence in individuals’ life have caused many users to solve their daily needs by search engines and hence, the search engines need to be modified and continuously improved. Therefore, evaluating search engines to determine their performance is of paramount importance. In Iran, as well as other countries, extensive researches are being performed ...

متن کامل

Health literacy and usability of clinical trial search engines.

Several web-based search engines have been developed to assist individuals to find clinical trials for which they may be interested in volunteering. However, these search engines may be difficult for individuals with low health and computer literacy to navigate. The authors present findings from a usability evaluation of clinical trial search tools with 41 participants across the health and com...

متن کامل

eTACTS: an Eligibility Tag Cloud-based Clinical Trial Search Engine

We present eTACTS, a Web search engine that allows users to select eligibility tags to filter clinical trial search results. A controlled vocabulary of frequent tags is automatically mined by cross-processing clinical trial eligibility criteria and used to index all the trials in ClinicalTrials.gov. After an initial search, these tags are presented to the users as an interactive tag cloud for i...

متن کامل

Online IR system evaluation: online databases versus Web search engines

This study evaluated two different types of online information retrieval (IR) systems: online databases and Web search engines, in terms of user generated criteria. It also compares four types of Web search engines: directories, search engines, meta-search engines, and specialized search engines. The results show that three elements are essential to users in the evaluation of online IR systems:...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 2014  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014